Published 11/21/2011 - 10:16 a.m. EST
This article is
the second in a
two-part series. To read
last week's article,
click the link in the
Related Articles box
below. If you would like
to submit an article to
PA
TIMES Online,
contact Editor Christine
Jewett McCrehin at
cjewett@aspanet.org.
Alexandru V.
Roman
The Hypocrisy of
Expectations
In
terms of dealing with
inherent tensions that
are present in public
administration–public
servants receive little
practical help from
academics. The gap
between theory and
practice has grown wider
in the
last decade.
This should not come as a
shock to anyone. A major
reason
for the divorce
between practice and
theory is the inability
of the
latter to “make
up its mind” in terms of
mixing efficiency
(bureaucracy)
and
democracy.
Published 11/14/2011 - 8:45 a.m. EST
This article is
the first in a two-part
series. Watch next
Monday, November 21,
2011, for the second
piece.
Alexandru V.
Roman
The
last
decade can be easily
characterized as an
administrative nightmare
both at the local and
the federal levels.
Looking back there was
always a
state of
crisis or emergency. The
September 11, 2001
terrorist attacks,
the
2001 recession, Storm
Allison in 2001,
hurricanes Ivan, Charley
and
Frances in 2004 and
Katrina and Rita in 2005,
California wildfires and
the Mississippi bridge
collapse in 2007,
hurricane Ike and the
Tuesday
tornado
outbreak in 2008, the
2007-2009 Financial
Crisis and the Great
Recession, the Arkansas
floods in 2010, and the
April tornadoes and
Spring flooding in
2011—are just some of the
events that have put
pressure on
administration and
emergency response in
particular.
However, it
appears that regardless
of their response, it is
now the
norm for
federal and local
administrations and
emergency response
agencies to be held at
fault for most of the
losses associated with
such
events or crises.