
| News | Sunday, May 20, 2012 |
Rachel Krefetz Fyall
Since the Friedrich-Finer debate of the 1940s, accountability has been prominent issue within public administration scholarship and practice. Even still, accountability concerns have become more urgent in response to recent structural changes in public service delivery. Within a traditional bureaucratic model, accountability refers to the expectation that those in government should be held responsible for their actions. While many varied forms of accountability exist (see Rainey’s discussion of responsiveness values, 2009, pp. 106-7), traditional discussions of accountability within the public administration literature limit the subject of accountability to “the government” (both elected officials and government employees) (Romzek and Dubnick 1987). As the boundaries distinguishing the public sector have increasingly blurred, however, the simple question of “Who is accountable?” has become more difficult to answer.
|
|
Left to right: Michael J. Ahn (Assistant Professor at UMass Boston), State Auditor Suzanne Bump, Frances Burke (President, Integrity International), and Mike George (President, MassASPA)
|